Quik Park Business VIPBook Parking

Airport Parking

The LAX People Mover Timeline: Approved in 2018, Still Not Open

Quick answer

The train was originally due by 2023 and is now predicted for January 2027, a slip of close to four years.

Last verified October 5, 2026
By Quik Park Editorial Team — Editorial Team — Quik Park Business VIP
5 min read
Couple in the front seats of a car in bright sunlight
At a glance
At a glance
Project approvedApril 11, 2018
Original completion targetMarch 2023
Currently predicted service dateJanuary 6, 2027
Slip from the original targetClose to four years
Original price tag​$1.9 billion
Reported overruns​$880 million
Reported total​$2.78 billion
Carrying passengers todayNo

We run an off-site parking lot, so we have an obvious interest in how people get from their cars to the terminals at LAX. Read this with that in mind, and check the sources, which are linked at the bottom of the page.

What follows is the documented schedule history of the airport's people mover. Not opinion about whether it is worth it, which is a reasonable debate. Just the dates, because travelers keep planning around a train that is not running.

The timeline

April 11, 2018. The Los Angeles City Council approves the project.

March 2023. The original scheduled completion. LAist puts it plainly: the train was originally slated to open by 2023[1].

June 7, 2024. A Project Neutral arbitrator rules that LAWA was responsible for 526 days of delay[2].

End of 2023, reported later. By this point the city had already paid more than $200 million to settle disputes[1].

Early 2025. A Los Angeles World Airports spokesperson says the system is planned to open to the public in early 2026[1]. That date passes.

June 2025. A county grand jury report lands, with findings covered below.

August 2025. Fitch Ratings projects completion in January 2026, with testing and commissioning continuing through June 2026[2], against what it calls the revised target completion date of June 2026[2].

April 21, 2026. System demonstration testing began[2], intended to demonstrate 30 days of uninterrupted operation without significant issues before passengers are allowed[2].

September 20, 2026. The lender longstop date is aligned with the project longstop date of December 8, 2026, a two-month delay[2].

Currently. LINXS has predicted a passenger service availability date of January 6, 2027[2].

Today. Not carrying passengers.

Doing the arithmetic

From a March 2023 target to a predicted January 6, 2027 opening is close to four years past the original schedule. From council approval in April 2018 to that predicted date is roughly eight and a half years for a 2.25-mile line.

You will see the delay described as five years in places. The documented figure against the original completion target is just under four, which is a large enough number that it does not need rounding up.

What the grand jury found

The most substantive public account came from the Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury. Its report attributed the project's setbacks to a strained relationship between LAWA and the LINXS consortium, political pressure to complete the system before major regional events, and shortcomings in the contract's dispute-resolution provisions.

Reporting on that inquiry described an icy relationship[1] between the airport authority and its contractor, and inadequate[1] conflict resolution processes, as causes of both the delays and the overruns.

On cost, LAist reported the project is $880 million more expensive than the original $1.9 billion price tag[1], for a total of $2.78 billion[1].

Why a traveler should care

Not for the politics. For three practical reasons.

Published advice is wrong. A large amount of travel writing describes riding this train. If a parking guide tells you to take it, that guide was written against a date that did not hold, and you should discount the rest of it accordingly.

Dates have not been reliable. Early 2026, June 2026, December 2026, January 2027. If your trip depends on the train existing, it does not yet.

The ground reality has not changed in four years. Every route from a parking space to a terminal at LAX is made by road, in a shuttle or a car, exactly as it was in 2023. Our shuttles have run every 10 minutes, 24 hours a day, throughout.

What we are not saying

That the project is a boondoggle, or that it will not be good when it opens. We think it will be good, and we said so in detail in what the train actually replaces. A free train on an elevated guideway, running around the clock, is a real improvement for the people it serves.

We are also not saying it will miss January 2027. It might well make it. Testing has been underway since April.

What we are saying is narrower: plan your trip around what is running on the day you fly. That is good advice regardless of who is building what, and it would be the same advice if we were in a different business.

What changes when it opens

Less than most coverage implies, and not evenly.

It will materially improve LAX Economy Parking, the Rental Car Center and the Metro connection, because those are the facilities its six stations serve. We compared Economy Parking against our own service, including where they beat us, in an honest head-to-head.

It will not serve private off-site lots, which sit on the surrounding streets rather than on the airport's own loop. Those shuttles keep running.

And it will not carry anybody's luggage, which is the part of this comparison we think about most. We wrote about that in the last 200 yards.

Keeping this current

We maintain a status page for the system and will update it when it opens rather than leaving a stale claim on the internet, which is the failure mode this entire article is about.

Dates and figures here were verified on October 5, 2026. Sources are listed below. If a date in this article is in the past and the train is running, trust the train over the article.

Sources

  1. [1] LAist, grand jury report on LAX people mover delays · accessed 2026-10-05 ↩
  2. [2] LAX Automated People Mover (SkyLink) · accessed 2026-10-05 ↩

Frequently asked questions

Editorial standards: see our editorial policy.